Fluker v. Martin-Chaney, Inc.

185 So. 2d 700, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3646
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1966
DocketNo. 35069
StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 2d 700 (Fluker v. Martin-Chaney, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fluker v. Martin-Chaney, Inc., 185 So. 2d 700, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3646 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [701]*701there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 2d 700, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluker-v-martin-chaney-inc-fla-1966.