Fluker v. Fluker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fluker v. Fluker

296 So. 2d 507, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6960

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1495

StatusPublished

This text of 296 So. 2d 507 (Fluker v. Fluker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fluker v. Fluker, 296 So. 2d 507, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6960 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the petitioner-husband from portions of a final judgment entered in his suit for dissolution of marriage and other relief.

Appellant contends that the court erred in (1) awarding the custody of the minor [508]*508children to the mother and the remaining five to the appellant; (2) awarding the mother $10.00 per week as child support for each of the three children; (3) awarding the mother the single family residence in Jacksonville, Florida, where she resides with the three children; (4) in directing the payment of $3,500.00 to the appellee out of the trust account. It is also argued that the allowance of attorney fees for the wife was excessive, notwithstanding counsel’s stipulation in open court as to the reasonableness of the amount.

We have considered each point in the light of the record and the applicable principles of law, and have determined that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Meltzer v. Meltzer, Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 470; Linares v. Linares, Fla.App. 1974, 292 So.2d 63.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the petitioner-husband from portions of a final judgment entered in his suit for dissolution of marriage and other relief.

Appellant contends that the court erred in (1) awarding the custody of the minor [508]*508children to the mother and the remaining five to the appellant; (2) awarding the mother $10.00 per week as child support for each of the three children; (3) awarding the mother the single family residence in Jacksonville, Florida, where she resides with the three children; (4) in directing the payment of $3,500.00 to the appellee out of the trust account. It is also argued that the allowance of attorney fees for the wife was excessive, notwithstanding counsel’s stipulation in open court as to the reasonableness of the amount.

We have considered each point in the light of the record and the applicable principles of law, and have determined that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Meltzer v. Meltzer, Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 470; Linares v. Linares, Fla.App. 1974, 292 So.2d 63.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 So. 2d 507, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluker-v-fluker-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack