Fluker v. Davis
This text of 12 La. Ann. 613 (Fluker v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a second injunction sued out by this plaintiff to restrain the execution of a judgment against Thomas S. Ba/rham, upon lands in his possession derived from Ban'ham. See Fluker, administratrix v. Bobo, Sheriff, 11 Ann.
There are no grounds justifying a resort to the remedy of injunction pleaded in this case, which should not have been pleaded in the former suit. And it is inadmissible to hamper the execution of judgments by successive injunctions upon different grounds which might have been put at issue in one proceeding. Any other rule would open the door to endless litigation and delay. McMicken v. Morgan, 9 Ann., 208.
The mode of executing the judgment, so as to secure the respective rights of the parties upon the proceeds, has been provided for in the decree of the District Court, of which the plaintiff in question certainly has no reason to complain.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 La. Ann. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluker-v-davis-la-1857.