Fluellen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fluellen v. State

158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 221, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 267

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1931·No. 21297·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The single special ground of the motion for a new trial, not having been unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, can not be considered by this court.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial [222] was not error. The facts of this case differentiate it from the cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

Decided April 14, 1931. TP. TP. Larsen Jr., G. G. Groclceli, TP. E. While, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Merrill, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The single special ground of the motion for a new trial, not having been unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, can not be considered by this court.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial [222] was not error. The facts of this case differentiate it from the cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

Decided April 14, 1931. TP. TP. Larsen Jr., G. G. Groclceli, TP. E. While, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Merrill, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Fluellen v. State, 158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 221, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

158 S.E. 374 (Fluellen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related