Fluellen v. State

158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 221, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 267
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1931
Docket21297
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 S.E. 374 (Fluellen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fluellen v. State, 158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 221, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The single special ground of the motion for a new trial, not having been unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, can not be considered by this court.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial [222]*222was not error. The facts of this case differentiate it from the cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

Decided April 14, 1931. TP. TP. Larsen Jr., G. G. Groclceli, TP. E. While, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Merrill, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. Ramsey
116 S.E.2d 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 221, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluellen-v-state-gactapp-1931.