Fluellen v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Fluellen v. State

196 So. 807, 143 Fla. 418, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1218

DecidedJune 18, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 807 (Fluellen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fluellen v. State, 196 So. 807, 143 Fla. 418, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1218 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On writ of error .the judgment of conviction of the offense of grand larceny is challenged on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment.

The record has been examined in the light of the briefs filed and no reversible error is disclosed. The defendant’s own statements as a witness on the trial were sufficient to constitute sufficient basis for his conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI