Fluellen v. Nicholson

159 F. App'x 1002
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 2005
DocketNo. 06-7011
StatusPublished

This text of 159 F. App'x 1002 (Fluellen v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fluellen v. Nicholson, 159 F. App'x 1002 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether it should be dismissed as untimely.

On August 28, 2003, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims dismissed Bobby John Fluelleris appeal, case no. 03-1161, because he had not received a decision from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The court entered judgment on September 24, 2003. On October 11, 2005, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims received a document from Fluellen that it treated as a notice of appeal.

Any appeal of the judgment was due within 60 days, or by November 24, 2003. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1). Because Fluelleris notice of appeal was untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. [1003]*1003United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir. 1983).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed as untimely.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 F. App'x 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluellen-v-nicholson-cafc-2005.