Fluckiger v. Haber

144 A.D. 67, 128 N.Y.S. 740, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fluckiger v. Haber. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D. 65

Opinion

McLaughlin, J. :

The plaintiff’s wife was a passenger on a yacht on Rondout creek, Ulster county. The . yacht landed at a dock in that county owned by the defendant steamboat company for the purpose of permitting her to go ashore. While walldng upon ' the dock she stepped into a hole and sustained personal injury. Plaintiff brings this action to recover for loss of her services. After issue had been joined, the defendants moved to change the place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Ulster. The motion was denied and they appeal.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Fluckiger v. Haber (144 App. Div. 65), decided herewith, I think the motion should have been granted.

The order appealed from, therefore, should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Scott, Miller arid Dowling, JJ., concurred. • -

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fluckiger v. Haber, 144 A.D. 67, 128 N.Y.S. 740, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

144 A.D. 67 (Fluckiger v. Haber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fluckiger v. Haber
144 A.D. 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)