Fluckers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fluckers v. State

727 So. 2d 416, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088, 1999 WL 173701

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1999·No. No. 98-2303·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State has conceded that the trial court erred when it used one scoresheet to sentence the defendant in three pending cases because two of the offenses occurred under a different version of the sentencing guidelines than did the third violation. See § 921.0014(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.703(d). Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State has conceded that the trial court erred when it used one scoresheet to sentence the defendant in three pending cases because two of the offenses occurred under a different version of the sentencing guidelines than did the third violation. See § 921.0014(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.703(d). Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court for resentencing.

Fluckers v. State, 727 So. 2d 416, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088, 1999 WL 173701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

727 So. 2d 416 (Fluckers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.