Flucker v. 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Flucker v. 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington

520 So. 2d 740, 1988 La. LEXIS 740, 1988 WL 21147

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 10, 1988

DocketNo. 87-KH-1840

StatusPublished

This text of 520 So. 2d 740 (Flucker v. 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flucker v. 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, 520 So. 2d 740, 1988 La. LEXIS 740, 1988 WL 21147 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Flucker, Gary a/k/a; Howard, Melvin; applying for remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B", No. 19297.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Flucker, Gary a/k/a; Howard, Melvin; applying for remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B", No. 19297.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 So. 2d 740, 1988 La. LEXIS 740, 1988 WL 21147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flucker-v-22nd-judicial-district-court-parish-of-washington-la-1988.