Flubacher v. Kelly

49 Cal. 116
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 3,878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Niles, J.:

The motion to strike out the cost bill, if granted, would have effected a modification of the judgment, and the order refusing the motion can be reviewed only upon an appeal from the judgment. (Lasky v. Davis, 33 Cal., 677.)

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flubacher v. Kelly, 49 Cal. 116 (Cal. 1874).

49 Cal. 116 (Flubacher v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Empire Gold Mining Co. v. Bonanza Gold Mining Co.
7 P. 810 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Orr v. Haskell
2 Mont. 350 (Montana Supreme Court, 1876)