Flubacher v. Kelly
49 Cal. 116
This text of 49 Cal. 116 (Flubacher v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flubacher v. Kelly, 49 Cal. 116 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
The motion to strike out the cost bill, if granted, would have effected a modification of the judgment, and the order refusing the motion can be reviewed only upon an appeal from the judgment. (Lasky v. Davis, 33 Cal., 677.)
Appeal dismissed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Empire Gold Mining Co. v. Bonanza Gold Mining Co.
7 P. 810 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Orr v. Haskell
2 Mont. 350 (Montana Supreme Court, 1876)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flubacher-v-kelly-cal-1874.