Floyd v. Wilson

50 So. 122, 163 Ala. 283, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 513
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 1, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 So. 122 (Floyd v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Wilson, 50 So. 122, 163 Ala. 283, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 513 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

Upon the Original consideration of this cause, no point having been made and- argued as to the character of this action, we treated the counts as being for the statutory penalty for cutting trees; but after considering the counts more carefully we find that they are quare clausum fregit.—Blackburn v. Baker, 7 Port. 284; Rogers v. Brooks, 105 Ala. 549, 17 South. 97. We adhere, however, to our former conclusion that the trial court erred in not allowing the amendments offered, as they were intended merely for the purpose of correcting the description of the subject-matter, so as to meet the plaintiff’s proof. — Section 5367 of the Code of 1907; -

[285]*285The application for rehearing is overruled, the opinion is modified, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. •

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell/ C. J., and McClellan and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roden v. Capehart
70 So. 757 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Mobile Light & Railroad Co. v. Portiss
70 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Floyd v. Wilson
54 So. 528 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 122, 163 Ala. 283, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-wilson-ala-1909.