Floyd v. Thompson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Floyd v. Thompson

162 So. 2d 390, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1477

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 13, 1964

DocketNo. 10126

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 162 So. 2d 390 (Floyd v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floyd v. Thompson, 162 So. 2d 390, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1477 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

BOLIN, Judge.

This suit, originally instituted against Bryant W. Thompson and Kathryn D. Thompson and Traders & General Insurance Company, was dismissed as against Bryant W. Thompson and Katherjm D. Thompson, and substituted therefor as defendant was “The Unopened Succession of Frank D. Thompson,” reserving all rights against Traders and General Insurance Company, co-defendant. The subject suit was consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Stubbs, Canal Insurance Company and Traders & General Insurance Company, and reported in La.App., 162 So.2d 388. For the reasons shown therein, the judgment of the lower court rejecting plaintiffs’ demands is affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOLIN, Judge.

This suit, originally instituted against Bryant W. Thompson and Kathryn D. Thompson and Traders & General Insurance Company, was dismissed as against Bryant W. Thompson and Katherjm D. Thompson, and substituted therefor as defendant was “The Unopened Succession of Frank D. Thompson,” reserving all rights against Traders and General Insurance Company, co-defendant. The subject suit was consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Stubbs, Canal Insurance Company and Traders & General Insurance Company, and reported in La.App., 162 So.2d 388. For the reasons shown therein, the judgment of the lower court rejecting plaintiffs’ demands is affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 2d 390, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-thompson-lactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack