Floyd v. Thompson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Floyd v. Thompson

162 So. 2d 390, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1477

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 13, 1964·No. No. 10126·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BOLIN, Judge.

This suit, originally instituted against Bryant W. Thompson and Kathryn D. Thompson and Traders & General Insurance Company, was dismissed as against Bryant W. Thompson and Katherjm D. Thompson, and substituted therefor as defendant was “The Unopened Succession of Frank D. Thompson,” reserving all rights against Traders and General Insurance Company, co-defendant. The subject suit was consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Stubbs, Canal Insurance Company and Traders & General Insurance Company, and reported in La.App., 162 So.2d 388. For the reasons shown therein, the judgment of the lower court rejecting plaintiffs’ demands is affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOLIN, Judge.

This suit, originally instituted against Bryant W. Thompson and Kathryn D. Thompson and Traders & General Insurance Company, was dismissed as against Bryant W. Thompson and Katherjm D. Thompson, and substituted therefor as defendant was “The Unopened Succession of Frank D. Thompson,” reserving all rights against Traders and General Insurance Company, co-defendant. The subject suit was consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Stubbs, Canal Insurance Company and Traders & General Insurance Company, and reported in La.App., 162 So.2d 388. For the reasons shown therein, the judgment of the lower court rejecting plaintiffs’ demands is affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Floyd v. Thompson, 162 So. 2d 390, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1477 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

162 So. 2d 390 (Floyd v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related