Floyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Floyd v. State

461 S.W.3d 846, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 518, 2015 WL 2226363

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 2015·No. No. ED 101808·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Floyd appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex[847] tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum-setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Floyd appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex[847] tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum-setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Floyd v. State, 461 S.W.3d 846, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 518, 2015 WL 2226363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

461 S.W.3d 846 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.