Floyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Floyd v. State

36 S.E.2d 370, 73 Ga. App. 283, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 446

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 5, 1945

Docket31090.

StatusPublished

This text of 36 S.E.2d 370 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floyd v. State, 36 S.E.2d 370, 73 Ga. App. 283, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 446 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The assignments of error here are on the general grounds only. We have read the evidence very carefully and have sought earnestly to apply the conclusions of law presented by experienced and distinguished counsel for both the State and the accused. We have reached the conclusion that the evidence sustains the verdict. There is no assignment of error concerning the charge of the court or any error in the admission of testimony. We do not think that there is any issue involved in the case made in this record which would warrant a detailed discussion. Such a discussion could not inure to the benefit of the bench in any future trial or be a criterion that would benefit counsel in the trial of any case. This is true in view oí the many decisions already rendered on the issues involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The assignments of error here are on the general grounds only. We have read the evidence very carefully and have sought earnestly to apply the conclusions of law presented by experienced and distinguished counsel for both the State and the accused. We have reached the conclusion that the evidence sustains the verdict. There is no assignment of error concerning the charge of the court or any error in the admission of testimony. We do not think that there is any issue involved in the case made in this record which would warrant a detailed discussion. Such a discussion could not inure to the benefit of the bench in any future trial or be a criterion that would benefit counsel in the trial of any case. This is true in view oí the many decisions already rendered on the issues involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 S.E.2d 370, 73 Ga. App. 283, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-gactapp-1945.