Floyd v. State

111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 345, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 497
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1922
Docket13153
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 222 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 345, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A conviction of the offense of larceny from the house was fully supported by the evidence; the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and the defendants had a legal trial. It was not error to over[346]*346rule the motion for a new trial, which was based only upon the usual general grounds.

Decided March 7, 1922. Indictment for larceny from house; from Pulaski superior court — Judge Graham. November 12, 1921. D. R. Pearce, H. F. Lawson, for plaintiff in error. M. H. Boyer, solicitor-general, contra.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 345, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-gactapp-1922.