Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State

104 So. 3d 1282, 2013 WL 127444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Floyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8454 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2013·No. No. 1D11-6380·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Alexander v. State, 88 So.3d 417, 418-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding section 775.084(3)(a)6., Florida Statutes, requires that the trial court impose a habitual offender sentence where the criteria of the statute are otherwise met, even if the defendant’s offense falls within section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes).

WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 104 So. 3d 1282, 2013 WL 127444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

104 So. 3d 1282 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. State
88 So. 3d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)