Floyd v. State

104 So. 3d 1282, 2013 WL 127444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 339
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 2013
DocketNo. 1D11-6380
StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 3d 1282 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 104 So. 3d 1282, 2013 WL 127444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Alexander v. State, 88 So.3d 417, 418-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding section 775.084(3)(a)6., Florida Statutes, requires that the trial court impose a habitual offender sentence where the criteria of the statute are otherwise met, even if the defendant’s offense falls within section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes).

WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. State
88 So. 3d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 3d 1282, 2013 WL 127444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.