Floyd v. State

688 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1997 WL 101304
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 1997·No. No. 96-389·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1986) (sentencing errors which do not produce an illegal sentence or an unauthorized departure from the sentencing guidelines still require a contemporaneous objection if they are to be preserved for appeal), receded from on other grounds, Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); Pope v. State, 646 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (defendant who failed to present argument to trial court for review and ruling was precluded from raising issue on appeal).

PETERSON, C.J., and HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 688 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1997 WL 101304 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 1033 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Pope v. State
646 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State v. Whitfield
487 So. 2d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)