Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State

160 So. 557, 26 Ala. App. 385, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 87
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 22, 1935
Docket4 Div. 122.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 So. 557 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 160 So. 557, 26 Ala. App. 385, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 87 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinions

The warrant in the county court was issued without an affidavit signed by affiant. After conviction in the county court, an appeal was taken to the circuit court, where the solicitor filed a charge based upon the appeal. Neither the charge in the county court nor in the circuit court was signed by the affiant, but the affidavit was in writing and was sworn to. Under our decisions, the affidavit need not be signed. Holman v. State, 144 Ala. 95, 39 So. 646; Cain v. State, 18 Ala. App. 624, 93 So. 263.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Rehearing.
Application granted. Opinion substituted. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bush v. State
167 So. 335 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 557, 26 Ala. App. 385, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-alactapp-1935.