Floyd v. Sams

2 S.E.2d 729, 59 Ga. App. 907, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 455
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 1939
Docket27490
StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.E.2d 729 (Floyd v. Sams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Sams, 2 S.E.2d 729, 59 Ga. App. 907, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Eelton, J.

In a suit for personal injuries, where the evidence does not demand a finding for the plaintiff, and especially for the exact amount found by the jury, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed. Weinkle v. Brunswick & Western Railroad Co., 107 Ga. 367 (33 S. E. 471); Baker v. McGarr, 187 Ga. 533 (1 S. E. (2d) 403), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western Railroad
33 S.E. 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Baker v. McGarr
1 S.E.2d 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.E.2d 729, 59 Ga. App. 907, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-sams-gactapp-1939.