Floyd v. Rimes

149 S.E. 907, 169 Ga. 78, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 1929
DocketNo. 6878
StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 907 (Floyd v. Rimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Rimes, 149 S.E. 907, 169 Ga. 78, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 285 (Ga. 1929).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Under the evidence and the law the court did not err in directing a verdict; and the judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, C. J., and Hill, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. McGarrity
129 S.E. 644 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 907, 169 Ga. 78, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-rimes-ga-1929.