Floyd v. McGill

580 S.E.2d 364, 357 N.C. 163
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 1, 2003·No. No. 135P03·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

1. Def’s (Stephanie L. McGill) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA02-372)

2. Defs’ (Transit Management and City of Charlotte) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied

2. Denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. McGill, 580 S.E.2d 364, 357 N.C. 163 (N.C. 2003).

580 S.E.2d 364 (Floyd v. McGill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Freeman
756 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.
677 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
626 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)