Floyd v. Lucas
This text of Floyd v. Lucas (Floyd v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT August 11, 2004 _______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21169 _______________________
In The Matter Of: ANNA MARIE LUCAS
Debtor
----------------------------------------
BEN B. FLOYD, Trustee, Appellant,
versus
ASHLEIGH NICOLE LUCAS; CRYSTAL ANNA LUCAS; BRANDY MARIE LUCAS; STEPHEN WADE LUCAS, JR.,
Appellees.
______________________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (No. H-02-CV-4793) ______________________________________________________________________________
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After studying the briefs and record, we are convinced that the result in this case is
controlled by our precedent in the Matter of Simpson, 36 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 1994). We recognize
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. that there are slight differences between the two cases, but find no meaningful basis to distinguish
Simpson. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Floyd v. Lucas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-lucas-ca5-2004.