Floyd v. Kaminsky

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Floyd v. Kaminsky

103 S.E. 854, 25 Ga. App. 612, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 104

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 13, 1920

Docket11197

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 854 (Floyd v. Kaminsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floyd v. Kaminsky, 103 S.E. 854, 25 Ga. App. 612, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 104 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. This being a suit in trover to recover an automobile the title to which is admittedly in the plaintiff, and the only issue being whether or not the demand made upon the defendant had been properly and timely made, a verdict for the plaintiff is supported by the evidence, from which it is reasonably inferable, although not positively appearing in express language, that the demand was properly and timely made.

2. The motion for new. trial contains only the general grounds. The verdict being supported by the law and the evidence and having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. This being a suit in trover to recover an automobile the title to which is admittedly in the plaintiff, and the only issue being whether or not the demand made upon the defendant had been properly and timely made, a verdict for the plaintiff is supported by the evidence, from which it is reasonably inferable, although not positively appearing in express language, that the demand was properly and timely made.

2. The motion for new. trial contains only the general grounds. The verdict being supported by the law and the evidence and having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 854, 25 Ga. App. 612, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-kaminsky-gactapp-1920.