Floyd v. Jones

157 So. 3d 447, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1732, 2015 WL 509622
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-4335
StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 447 (Floyd v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Jones, 157 So. 3d 447, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1732, 2015 WL 509622 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Moore v. Correctional Medical Services, 817 So.2d 963, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“Absent a showing that the trial court has failed to take action on some pending matter he has noticed for hearing, [Petitioner] has failed to establish an entitlement to mandamus relief’).

RAY, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Correctional Medical Services
817 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 3d 447, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1732, 2015 WL 509622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-jones-fladistctapp-2015.