Floyd v. Goss

352 So. 2d 1189
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1977·No. 76-1650·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

352 So.2d 1189 (1977)

Joanne FLOYD and John E. Floyd, Her Husband, Petitioners,
v.
Dr. S.A. GOSS, and Orange Memorial Hospital, Respondents.

No. 76-1650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 9, 1977.
Rehearing Denied January 9, 1978.

Michael P. Falkowski of Parker, Conrad, Falkowski, Johnson & Owen, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Howard R. Marsee of Pitts, Eubanks, Ross & Rumberger, P.A., Orlando, for appellee-Orange Memorial Hospital.

Janis M. Halker of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, P.A., Orlando, for appellee-Dr. S.A. Goss.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We take this matter as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court in order to review an Order of a circuit judge sitting as a judicial referee in a medical mediation panel as provided in Section 768.133, Florida Statutes (1975), now Section 768.44, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976). Because the statutory creation of the medical mediation panel provides very narrowly what the duties of the judicial referee are, and the case law consistently supports the narrow construction, we must quash the Order of the judicial referee because it was not within his authority to dismiss the case or enter a Judgment on the Pleadings. In Koota v. Parkway, 346 So.2d 124 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), it was held "... a judicial referee of a medical panel under Section 768.44 Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976) is not a `judge of a lower court' within the meaning of Fla.App.Rule 4.6(a)." Also see State ex rel. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Vann, 342 So.2d 1073 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).

We hold that a circuit judge sitting as a judicial referee in a medical mediation panel is limited to act as a member of the panel with his or her authority limited by the act, supra, creating the panel and In re Transition Rule 21, 316 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1975). Such judicial referee has no authority to enter a judgment on the pleadings when the statute of limitations is pleaded and not contravened.

The Amended Judgment on the pleadings is quashed and this cause remanded to the medical mediation panel for disposition of its duties within the statutorily mandated time.

QUASHED and REMANDED.

CROSS and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. Goss, 352 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 1189 (Floyd v. Goss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mott v. Fort Pierce Memorial Hospital
375 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
McMahon v. Glixman
393 N.E.2d 875 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1979)
Finnk v. Tanner
366 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Taylor ex rel. Taylor v. Munroe Memorial Hospital
362 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Hubacher v. Landry
360 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Herrera v. Doctor's Hospital
360 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Drs. Howarth & Scott, PA v. Edwards
353 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)