Floyd v. Floyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

Floyd v. Floyd

830 S.W.2d 458, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 558, 1992 WL 62129

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1992·No. No. 60341·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Husband) appeals from part of a dissolution decree which found the stock in his professional corporation was marital property and which found Wife was entitled to an assignment of the value of the corporation’s goodwill. Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this Order [459]*459affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Husband) appeals from part of a dissolution decree which found the stock in his professional corporation was marital property and which found Wife was entitled to an assignment of the value of the corporation’s goodwill. Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this Order [459]*459affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Floyd v. Floyd, 830 S.W.2d 458, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 558, 1992 WL 62129 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

830 S.W.2d 458 (Floyd v. Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.