Floyd v. Dickey
96 S.E.2d 731, 245 N.C. 589, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609
This text of 96 S.E.2d 731 (Floyd v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Floyd v. Dickey, 96 S.E.2d 731, 245 N.C. 589, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609 (N.C. 1957).
Opinion
Dickey’s asserted liability is predicated on the theory of respondeat superior. There is no evidence to show that Crisp in moving the truck was the agent of Dickey and about his master’s business. Plaintiff does not have the benefit of G.S. 20-71.1 as she waited more than one year after the cause of action accrued before instituting suit. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holcombe v. Bowman
175 S.E.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Knight v. Associated Transport, Inc.
122 S.E.2d 64 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Darden v. Bone
119 S.E.2d 634 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 S.E.2d 731, 245 N.C. 589, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-dickey-nc-1957.