Floyd v. Dickey
96 S.E.2d 731, 245 N.C. 589, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609
Opinion
Dickey’s asserted liability is predicated on the theory of respondeat superior. There is no evidence to show that Crisp in moving the truck was the agent of Dickey and about his master’s business. Plaintiff does not have the benefit of G.S. 20-71.1 as she waited more than one year after the cause of action accrued before instituting suit. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Floyd v. Dickey, 96 S.E.2d 731, 245 N.C. 589, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609 (N.C. 1957).
96 S.E.2d 731 (Floyd v. Dickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holcombe v. Bowman
175 S.E.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Knight v. Associated Transport, Inc.
122 S.E.2d 64 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Darden v. Bone
119 S.E.2d 634 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)