Floyd v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Floyd v. City of New York

106 A.D.3d 623, 965 N.Y.S.2d 714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 623 (Floyd v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floyd v. City of New York, 106 A.D.3d 623, 965 N.Y.S.2d 714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 11, 2012, July 24, 2012, and July 26, 2012, annulling mayoral personnel orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2, dated April 11, 2012, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Fursuant to the subject mayoral personnel orders, the City issued rules reclassifying ungraded civil service titles subject to prevailing wage bargaining under Labor Law § 220 as graded workers subject to bargaining under the New York City Collec[624]*624tive Bargaining Law without complying with the procedures mandated by Civil Service Law § 20, i.e., notice, a public hearing, and approval by the State Civil Service Commission, which are applicable to those rules (see Matter of Corrigan v Joseph, 304 NY 172, 185 [1952], cert denied 345 US 924 [1953]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 31770OJ).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 11, 2012, July 24, 2012, and July 26, 2012, annulling mayoral personnel orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2, dated April 11, 2012, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Fursuant to the subject mayoral personnel orders, the City issued rules reclassifying ungraded civil service titles subject to prevailing wage bargaining under Labor Law § 220 as graded workers subject to bargaining under the New York City Collec[624]*624tive Bargaining Law without complying with the procedures mandated by Civil Service Law § 20, i.e., notice, a public hearing, and approval by the State Civil Service Commission, which are applicable to those rules (see Matter of Corrigan v Joseph, 304 NY 172, 185 [1952], cert denied 345 US 924 [1953]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 31770OJ).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 623, 965 N.Y.S.2d 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack