Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Floyd v. Burnham

Floyd v. Burnham

889 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463, 2004 WL 2921790
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-1215
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 964 (Floyd v. Burnham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Burnham, 889 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463, 2004 WL 2921790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An order that grants a motion to dismiss without more is not final nor is it an appealable nonfinal order. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). DISMISSED.

WOLF, C.J., WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Truc v. Kimmins Corp.
889 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463, 2004 WL 2921790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-burnham-fladistctapp-2004.