Floyd v. Brown

Fourth Circuit

Floyd v. Brown

122 F. App'x 683

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2005·No. No. 04-7986·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September 24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September 24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Floyd v. Brown, 122 F. App'x 683 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

122 F. App'x 683 (Floyd v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.