Floyd v. Board of Regents
This text of 772 So. 2d 634 (Floyd v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge erred in denying the appellant’s motion to disqualify the judge. See MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978); Smith v. Santa Rosa Island Authority, 729 So.2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The order by which the motion to disqualify was denied is therefore reversed. The summary final judgment entered thereafter is also reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings before a different judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 So. 2d 634, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337, 2000 WL 1838733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-board-of-regents-fladistctapp-2000.