Floyd v. Bell
Opinion
“A plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant’s title.” Code, § 33-101. Taken as a whole, the evidence adduced on the trial of this ejectment suit was too vague and indefinite to show title in the plaintiffs, by virtue of inheritance, through parties dying years ago; and the trial court did not err, at the conclusion of evidence offered by both sides, in directing a verdict for the defendant, who, according to the plaintiffs’ evidence, had been in possession of the premises for a long number of years prior to the institution of the suit. Anderson v. Robinson, 75 Ga. 375 (2).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
42 S.E.2d 639 (Floyd v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.