Floyd v. Alabama

136 S. Ct. 2484, 195 L. Ed. 2d 820, 84 U.S.L.W. 3682, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4053
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 20, 2016
DocketNo. 15–7553.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S. Ct. 2484 (Floyd v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. Alabama, 136 S. Ct. 2484, 195 L. Ed. 2d 820, 84 U.S.L.W. 3682, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4053 (U.S. 2016).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1737, 195 L.E.2d 1 (2016).

Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissenting from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: I would deny the petition for the reasons set out in my statement in Flowers v. Mississippi, 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2157, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (ALITO, J., dissenting from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
199 So. 3d 1222 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S. Ct. 2484, 195 L. Ed. 2d 820, 84 U.S.L.W. 3682, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-alabama-scotus-2016.