Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States

362 F.2d 1011, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6919

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1966

Docket19798

StatusPublished

This text of 362 F.2d 1011 (Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States, 362 F.2d 1011, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6919 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

362 F.2d 1011

Floyd L. CROWDER, individually and doing business as Crowder
& Son, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 19798.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 10, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; Thomas J. MacBride, Judge.

Richard A. Case, Sacramento, Cal., for appellant.

John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, David L. Rose, J. F. Bishop, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Judgment affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court's memorandum dum and order, 255 F.Supp. 873.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI