Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States
Opinion
362 F.2d 1011
Floyd L. CROWDER, individually and doing business as Crowder
& Son, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19798.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 10, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; Thomas J. MacBride, Judge.
Richard A. Case, Sacramento, Cal., for appellant.
John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, David L. Rose, J. F. Bishop, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court's memorandum dum and order, 255 F.Supp. 873.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
362 F.2d 1011 (Floyd L. Crowder, Individually and Doing Business as Crowder & Son v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.