Floyd J. Wilmoth v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Western Maryland Railway Company

923 F.2d 850, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7687, 1991 WL 3116
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1991
Docket89-1537
StatusUnpublished

This text of 923 F.2d 850 (Floyd J. Wilmoth v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Western Maryland Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd J. Wilmoth v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Western Maryland Railway Company, 923 F.2d 850, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7687, 1991 WL 3116 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

923 F.2d 850
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Floyd J. WILMOTH, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Western Maryland
Railway Company, Respondents.

No. 89-1537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 1990.
Decided Jan. 17, 1991.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (88-818-BLA)

Floyd J. Wilmoth, petitioner pro se.

Priscilla Anne Schwab, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., Sharon Easthom Rowsey, Huddleston, Bolen, Beatty, Porter & Copen, Ashland, Ky., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Floyd J. Wilmoth seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.* Wilmoth v. Director, OWCP, 88-818-BLA (Aug. 31, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

Western Maryland Railway Company's motion to dismiss is denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Workman (Rodney Jeff)
923 F.2d 850 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 F.2d 850, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7687, 1991 WL 3116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-j-wilmoth-v-director-office-of-workers-compe-ca4-1991.