Floyd Donley, Sr. v. Hudsons Salvage, L.L.C., et a

593 F. App'x 411
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2015·No. 14-30899·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Floyd P. Donley, Sr., appeals from the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction because both parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). Donley originally brought suit against Hudsons Salvage and both parties signed a consent form permitting final resolution of the case by a magistrate judge. § 636(c)(3). The magistrate judge granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Donley appealed, and we affirmed. The Supreme Court then denied certiorari.

Donley argues that he never consented to have the particular magistrate judge who heard his case and that this magistrate judge lacked “personal jurisdiction.” In addition to the numerous problems with the merits of this argument, this case was fully resolved, appealed, and certiorari was denied. Donley’s argument is moot and for that reason the judgment of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to Fifth Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd Donley, Sr. v. Hudsons Salvage, L.L.C., et a, 593 F. App'x 411 (5th Cir. 2015).

593 F. App'x 411 (Floyd Donley, Sr. v. Hudsons Salvage, L.L.C., et a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related