Floyd Davis Company v. Britton

221 F.2d 519
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 18, 1954·No. 12053·Published

Opinion

221 F.2d 519

95 U.S.App.D.C. 241

FLOYD E. DAVIS COMPANY, and Globe Indemnity Company, Appellants,
v.
Theodore BRITTON, Deputy Commissioner, District of Columbia
Compensation District, Bureau of Employees
Compensation, and Alice M. Casey and
James L. Casey, Jr., Appellees.

No. 12053.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 8, 1954.
Decided Nov. 18, 1954.

Mr. Francis W. McInerny, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Mr. S. Jay McCathran, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant Floyd E. Davis Co.

Mr. Hugh Lynch, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant Globe Indemnity Co.

Mr. Ward E. Boote, Asst. Sol., United States Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee Britton. Mr. Jacob N. Halper, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellees Casey.

[95 U.S.App.D.C. 242] Before BAZELON, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing appellants' suit to enjoin the enforcement of a workman's compensation award. We find no error. The District Court's order is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd Davis Company v. Britton, 221 F.2d 519 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

221 F.2d 519 (Floyd Davis Company v. Britton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Floyd E. Davis Co. v. Britton
221 F.2d 519 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)