Floyd Dale Knight v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 9, 2013
• Docket: 05-13-00764-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00760-CR No. 05-13-00761-CR No. 05-13-00762-CR No. 05-13-00763-CR No. 05-13-00764-CR

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 2-13-66, 2-13-228, 2-13-106, 2-13-107, 2-13-108

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice O’Neill Floyd Dale Knight was convicted of two offenses of possession with intent to deliver a

controlled substance in an amount less than one gram in a drug free zone and three offenses of

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount of one gram or more but

less than four grams in a drug free zone. Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court assessed

punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine in each case. Appellant waived his

right to appeal in connection with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–

20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified both that appellant waived his right to appeal

and that the cases involve plea bargains and appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130760F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court, Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-13-00760-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 2-13-66. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2013.

–3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court, Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-13-00761-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 2-13-228. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–4– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court, Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-13-00762-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 2-13-106. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–5– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court, Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-13-00763-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 2-13-107. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–6– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court, Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-13-00764-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 2-13-108. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–7–