Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC
This text of Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC (Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED FLOYD D. JOHNSON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-6
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellees.
________________________________/
Decision filed July 21, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Dennis Craig, Judge.
Floyd D. Johnson, Daytona Beach, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee State of Florida.
No Appearance for Appellee Department of Corrections.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. COHEN, C.J., concurs specially, with opinion. CASE NO. 5D17-6
COHEN, C.J., concurring specially.
Johnson appeals the Volusia County Circuit Court’s dismissal of his petition for writ
of habeas corpus. In his petition, Johnson attacks the validity of his Seminole County
conviction, arguing that the Seminole County court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over
his case because the amended information was defective. Johnson’s conviction resulted
in his confinement at a correctional facility in Volusia County.
In general, a petition for habeas corpus must be filed in the circuit court in the
county in which the petitioner is detained. Collins v. State, 859 So. 2d 1244, 1245 (Fla.
5th DCA 2003). However, when a petitioner collaterally attacks the validity of his or her
underlying conviction or sentence, “jurisdiction in habeas proceedings lies with the trial
court that imposed the sentence and rendered the judgment of conviction.” Id.; see also
Batista v. State, 993 So. 2d 93, 95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). In addition, Johnson’s claim
should have been brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(2)–(3),
which authorizes relief from a judgment or sentence entered without jurisdiction. Rule
3.850(m) limits the discretion of the court to entertain habeas petitions when the petitioner
could have sought relief under rule 3.850. Thus, the trial court properly dismissed
Johnson’s petition because he should have filed a motion for postconviction relief in
Seminole County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-d-johnson-v-doc-fladistctapp-2017.