Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 2017
Docket5D17-6
StatusPublished

This text of Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC (Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED FLOYD D. JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-6

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Decision filed July 21, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Dennis Craig, Judge.

Floyd D. Johnson, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee State of Florida.

No Appearance for Appellee Department of Corrections.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. COHEN, C.J., concurs specially, with opinion. CASE NO. 5D17-6

COHEN, C.J., concurring specially.

Johnson appeals the Volusia County Circuit Court’s dismissal of his petition for writ

of habeas corpus. In his petition, Johnson attacks the validity of his Seminole County

conviction, arguing that the Seminole County court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over

his case because the amended information was defective. Johnson’s conviction resulted

in his confinement at a correctional facility in Volusia County.

In general, a petition for habeas corpus must be filed in the circuit court in the

county in which the petitioner is detained. Collins v. State, 859 So. 2d 1244, 1245 (Fla.

5th DCA 2003). However, when a petitioner collaterally attacks the validity of his or her

underlying conviction or sentence, “jurisdiction in habeas proceedings lies with the trial

court that imposed the sentence and rendered the judgment of conviction.” Id.; see also

Batista v. State, 993 So. 2d 93, 95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). In addition, Johnson’s claim

should have been brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(2)–(3),

which authorizes relief from a judgment or sentence entered without jurisdiction. Rule

3.850(m) limits the discretion of the court to entertain habeas petitions when the petitioner

could have sought relief under rule 3.850. Thus, the trial court properly dismissed

Johnson’s petition because he should have filed a motion for postconviction relief in

Seminole County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Batista v. State
993 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Collins v. State
859 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Floyd D. Johnson v. DOC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-d-johnson-v-doc-fladistctapp-2017.