Floyd and Genevieve Horton v. Frans P. Jessie

423 F.2d 722
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1970·No. 23129·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The parties were involved in a California automobile accident. Plaintiffs are citizens of Missouri and defendant is a citizen of California. California has a one year statute of limitations and Missouri has a five year statute. The district court has held the California statute applicable and rendered judgment for the defendant.

There is a good argument that the statute was tolled for 13 or 14 months, but thereafter there was a period of approximately 15 months until the suit was filed in California.

Under the California significant contacts approach, we find too little Missouri significant contacts and too many in California to apply the Missouri statute.

We find the laches point of appellant without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd and Genevieve Horton v. Frans P. Jessie, 423 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1970).

423 F.2d 722 (Floyd and Genevieve Horton v. Frans P. Jessie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schreiber v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
448 F. Supp. 1079 (D. Kansas, 1978)
Walter W. Wright v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
522 F.2d 1376 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Kalmich v. Bruno
404 F. Supp. 57 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Klingebiel v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation
372 F. Supp. 1086 (N.D. California, 1971)