Flowers v. Warlick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Flowers v. Warlick

142 S.W.2d 274, 1940 Tex. App. LEXIS 539

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 20, 1940

DocketNo. 3951

StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.W.2d 274 (Flowers v. Warlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. Warlick, 142 S.W.2d 274, 1940 Tex. App. LEXIS 539 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Chief Justice.

In this case plaintiff, L. G. Warlick, filed suit against Mrs. J. H. Flowers in the [275]*275District Court of Gaines County to recover certain property situated in the town of Seagraves. The defendant, among other things, pleaded not guilty, and a cross action against plaintiff. The trial was to a jury and at the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant as to plaintiff’s cause of action and the cause of action asserted by her in her cross action. Appeal was duly perfected to this court.

Appellant has failed to file a brief herein, and no assignments of error on behalf of appellant appear in the record. We have examined the record for fundamental error, and find that the judgment is sustained by the pleading and proof.

It is therefore ordered that the cause be in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Chief Justice.

In this case plaintiff, L. G. Warlick, filed suit against Mrs. J. H. Flowers in the [275]*275District Court of Gaines County to recover certain property situated in the town of Seagraves. The defendant, among other things, pleaded not guilty, and a cross action against plaintiff. The trial was to a jury and at the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant as to plaintiff’s cause of action and the cause of action asserted by her in her cross action. Appeal was duly perfected to this court.

Appellant has failed to file a brief herein, and no assignments of error on behalf of appellant appear in the record. We have examined the record for fundamental error, and find that the judgment is sustained by the pleading and proof.

It is therefore ordered that the cause be in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 S.W.2d 274, 1940 Tex. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-warlick-texapp-1940.