Flowers v. Wall's Odorless Cleaners Inc.

172 S.E. 561, 178 Ga. 201, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 9
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1934
DocketNo. 9762
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 S.E. 561 (Flowers v. Wall's Odorless Cleaners Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flowers v. Wall's Odorless Cleaners Inc., 172 S.E. 561, 178 Ga. 201, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 9 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction until the case can be finally heard on its merits. Whitley Grocery Co. v. McCaw Mfg. Co., 105 Ga. 839 (32 S. E. 113).

2. Where, on the hearing of an application for injunction, the court fails “to pass upon” a special plea in abatement, but defers that question until the final hearing, this court will not rule on an assignment of error based upon the failure to render such a judgment. The question will be left open, without prejudice, until further order thereon in the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conmr, except Hitt, J., absent because of illness. Thomas J. Lewis and W. 0. Blale, for plaintiff in error. Hendrix & Buchanan and Clifford Hendrix, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Local Union No. 3871 v. Fortner
42 S.E.2d 734 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 S.E. 561, 178 Ga. 201, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-walls-odorless-cleaners-inc-ga-1934.