Flowers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Flowers v. State

1922 OK CR 164, 210 P. 1118, 22 Okla. Crim. 160, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 28, 1922

DocketNo. A-3974.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 164 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. State, 1922 OK CR 164, 210 P. 1118, 22 Okla. Crim. 160, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error and Denny Swan were by information jointly charged with unlawfully conveying iy<2, gallons of whisky from a place unkown to a place about two miles east of Owl City, in Stephens county. Upon his separate trial the plaintiff in error, Flowers, was convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $400 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on the 22d day of February, 1921, an appeal was duly perfected. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. An examination of the record shows that the testimony of the witnesses for the state support the allegations of the information, and that no testimony was offered on the part of the defense, and it is apparent that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error and Denny Swan were by information jointly charged with unlawfully conveying iy<2, gallons of whisky from a place unkown to a place about two miles east of Owl City, in Stephens county. Upon his separate trial the plaintiff in error, Flowers, was convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $400 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on the 22d day of February, 1921, an appeal was duly perfected. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. An examination of the record shows that the testimony of the witnesses for the state support the allegations of the information, and that no testimony was offered on the part of the defense, and it is apparent that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 164, 210 P. 1118, 22 Okla. Crim. 160, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.