Flowers v. State

271 S.W.3d 74, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, 2008 WL 5456247
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 25, 2008
DocketED 91071
StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.W.3d 74 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flowers v. State, 271 S.W.3d 74, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, 2008 WL 5456247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Steven Flowers, appeals the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record *75 on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwell v. Southwell
271 S.W.3d 74 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 S.W.3d 74, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, 2008 WL 5456247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-moctapp-2008.