Flowers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Flowers v. State

271 S.W.3d 74, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, 2008 WL 5456247

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. ED 91071·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Steven Flowers, appeals the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record *75 on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Steven Flowers, appeals the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record *75 on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Flowers v. State, 271 S.W.3d 74, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, 2008 WL 5456247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

271 S.W.3d 74 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related