Flowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Flowers v. State

237 So. 3d 482

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2018

DocketNo. 1D17–3298

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 So. 3d 482 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. State, 237 So. 3d 482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Hamilton v. State , 996 So.2d 964, 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (rejecting defendant's claim that his sentence violates Hale v. State , 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), where, as here, the sentence "do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if all sentences subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute had been enhanced (but run concurrently), and because his sentence[ ] also do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if none of his sentences had been enhanced but all had been ordered to run consecutively").

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Hamilton v. State , 996 So.2d 964, 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (rejecting defendant's claim that his sentence violates Hale v. State , 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), where, as here, the sentence "do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if all sentences subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute had been enhanced (but run concurrently), and because his sentence[ ] also do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if none of his sentences had been enhanced but all had been ordered to run consecutively").

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 So. 3d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack