Flowers v. Metropolitan Dade County

314 So. 2d 207, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1975
DocketNo. 74-1122
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 314 So. 2d 207 (Flowers v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flowers v. Metropolitan Dade County, 314 So. 2d 207, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The point presented upon this appeal is whether the giving of a designated instruction to the jury constitutes reversible error. The instruction has been approved as to form and content. Potock v. Turek, Fla.[208]*208App.1969, 227 So.2d 724. A party is entitled to an instruction upon an issue raised by the evidence. See Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Bracewell, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 482, and Parker v. Chew, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d 695. Here, an issue of negligence was tried; therefore, the instruction was applicable. The only remaining consideration is whether the instruction constituted reversible error in that, when considered together with the entire charge to the jury, it was improper. Keyser v. Brunette, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 840. We hold that the giving of the instruction did not constitute reversible error. Cf. Chambers v. Nottebaum, Fla.App.1957, 96 So.2d 716, 721, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. ATLANTIC FERTILIZER & CHEM.
515 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 So. 2d 207, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1975.