Flowers v. Haskins

267 N.E.2d 430, 25 Ohio St. 2d 186, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 550
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 1971·No. No. 70-717·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner is presently in custody pursuant to two sentences imposed on him following convictions for two separate crimes. Even assuming the validity of petitioner’s contention concerning his 1968 conviction, he is still properly incarcerated on his sentence op. his 1967 [187] conviction. He is not, therefore, entitled to release in habeas corpus. Ball v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 77.

Petitioner has an available remedy by postconviction proceedings for contesting the validity of his 1968 conviction for breaking and entering an inhabited dwelling in the night season.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, CORRIGAN, StERN and LeACH, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., and Duncan, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flowers v. Haskins, 267 N.E.2d 430, 25 Ohio St. 2d 186, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 550 (Ohio 1971).

267 N.E.2d 430 (Flowers v. Haskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swiger v. Seidner
1996 Ohio 237 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. Thomas
400 N.E.2d 897 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson
255 So. 2d 85 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)