Flowers v. . Glasgow

Superior Court of North Carolina

Flowers v. . Glasgow

2 N.C. 122

DecidedOctober 5, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 122 (Flowers v. . Glasgow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. . Glasgow, 2 N.C. 122 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

The evidence must be so understood; and they directed the jury that this evidence was sufficient proof of the possession having been in the defendant at that time; but the cause, for another reason, was adjourned.

NOTE. — WILLIAMS, J., said in this case, upon another part of the argument, that he should yield to the decision in Tims v. Potter, 1 N.C. 12, until it should be contradicted by a more full decision to the contrary. It was decided by two judges, ASHE and SPENCER, against his opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The evidence must be so understood; and they directed the jury that this evidence was sufficient proof of the possession having been in the defendant at that time; but the cause, for another reason, was adjourned.

NOTE. — WILLIAMS, J., said in this case, upon another part of the argument, that he should yield to the decision in Tims v. Potter, 1 N.C. 12, until it should be contradicted by a more full decision to the contrary. It was decided by two judges, ASHE and SPENCER, against his opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.C. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-glasgow-ncsuperct-1794.