Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations

435 So. 2d 81, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 6, 1983

DocketCiv. Nos. 2770, 2771, 2772, 2773, 2774, 2775, 2776, 2777 and 2778

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 435 So. 2d 81 (Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations, 435 So. 2d 81, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As ordered by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 435 So.2d 76, that aspect of the decision of this court, 435 So.2d 72, in the above styled cause holding that James L. Ross, Sr., John G. Mayo, and Clyde W. Webster were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits is set aside and a judgment entered directing the trial court to set aside its judgment that these persons were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits and to enter a judgment awarding them such benefits as they are entitled to receive under the decision of the supreme court in this case.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As ordered by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 435 So.2d 76, that aspect of the decision of this court, 435 So.2d 72, in the above styled cause holding that James L. Ross, Sr., John G. Mayo, and Clyde W. Webster were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits is set aside and a judgment entered directing the trial court to set aside its judgment that these persons were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits and to enter a judgment awarding them such benefits as they are entitled to receive under the decision of the supreme court in this case.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 So. 2d 81, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-director-department-of-industrial-relations-alacivapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack