Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations

435 So. 2d 81, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 6, 1983·No. Civ. Nos. 2770, 2771, 2772, 2773, 2774, 2775, 2776, 2777 and 2778·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As ordered by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 435 So.2d 76, that aspect of the decision of this court, 435 So.2d 72, in the above styled cause holding that James L. Ross, Sr., John G. Mayo, and Clyde W. Webster were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits is set aside and a judgment entered directing the trial court to set aside its judgment that these persons were not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits and to enter a judgment awarding them such benefits as they are entitled to receive under the decision of the supreme court in this case.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations, 435 So. 2d 81, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

435 So. 2d 81 (Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial Relations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitts v. Vaughan
435 So. 2d 83 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)