Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.

76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 80, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 296

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 30, 1912

Docket8353

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 32 (Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 80, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 296 (S.C. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

So far as the facts are involved in this appeal, there is abundant evidence to support the judgment of the Circuit Court. Therefore, the facts are not reviewable in this Court. The law is settled against appellant in the cases of Brackett v. Ry., 88 S. C. 447, 70 S. E. 1026, and Neal v. Ry., 92 S. C. 197. The evidence warranted the awarding of substantial damages in both cases.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

So far as the facts are involved in this appeal, there is abundant evidence to support the judgment of the Circuit Court. Therefore, the facts are not reviewable in this Court. The law is settled against appellant in the cases of Brackett v. Ry., 88 S. C. 447, 70 S. E. 1026, and Neal v. Ry., 92 S. C. 197. The evidence warranted the awarding of substantial damages in both cases.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 80, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-atlantic-coast-line-r-r-sc-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack