Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 80, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 296
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
So far as the facts are involved in this appeal, there is abundant evidence to support the judgment of the Circuit Court. Therefore, the facts are not reviewable in this Court. The law is settled against appellant in the cases of Brackett v. Ry., 88 S. C. 447, 70 S. E. 1026, and Neal v. Ry., 92 S. C. 197. The evidence warranted the awarding of substantial damages in both cases.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 80, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 296 (S.C. 1912).
76 S.E. 32 (Flowers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamond v. Southeastern Express Co.
128 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Jefferson v. Coastal Life Ins. Co.
117 S.E. 721 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1923)